Also, I'll have you, and Tallie both know, that I have in public, and in private emails, recommended Tallie to AdultTime and GFF for inclusion in their lesbian productions. I have ACTIVELY tried to help her more opportunities. I have also tagged her name on Twitter in various "Who do you want to see?" tweets for sites I'm a member at (member at 20 different adult websites).

So you can say I'm only hurting the model with the low ratings, I disagree, that's you that's forcing that, but moreever; I have done everything in my power to get her more opportunties and contracts.

If you don't believe me Alex, send me an email at the email I have on file, I will forward you the emails and I will forward them with the email address of the person I have been in contact with over those attempts at getting her cast.

I love Tallie and I hope to see more of her! But her, not men and crew. And I do my best to help make that happen. The snide remarks about me "hurting the models" couldn't be further from the truth.

If you're interested at all, by the way Alex, I have put over ALS Scans multiple times in Adult Time's comment section as being quality content, and recommending them reach out to you for a possible channel on their platform - no idea if that's anything you all are interested in at all, but, not for nothing, I do my best to spread the good word. To get eyes on your content and to get jobs for the models I truly appreciate.

Again, email and ask Frank Stacy if I have said such in the comment sections. Or the moderator Nathan Fillerin, who's noted the recommendation.

Do the models have zero say in you forcing your way into their shoots? I think the unfair thing is models know many fans don't like it, and they don't like lower scores, and you know it happens, and yet you feel like you need to still do it.

Do you think this "style" you double down on is winning you fans? Winning you subscribers? Do you think, disregarding me, that those sets are more popular than the ones with you and the crew in it?
So you can be in love with your style all you want. That is your right as the person who runs this show.

Just the same, it's the right of those who paid their coin to rate as they see fit. And as I see fit anytime you or the crew shows up, that's a 1/10.

Not my fault, not the model's fault. It's your fault. Not a slam against the models. I rate the models I love on their page a 10/10, on their model page. The sets you choose to ruin by putting men and crew in them get the 1/10 ratings.

Ideally if enough traction takes places more and more models will resist you shoving yourself in their photos and films. Or they'll just go other places where they don't have to suffer such - I'm a member at many of these sorts of websites.

Hope I'm proud? This is the content you're creating, a situation of your own choosing, some bizarre bent on thinking people want to see you and other men or crew in the shots (some do I grant), maybe many do, but I'd be willing to bet dollars to dimes not a one would leave or rate negatively if you excluded crew shots and men shots. But you have folks like myself, and others I'm sure, who either never would consider joining, or won't resign due to their inclusion.

In the final analysis, it should not be this hard to find male free pornographic content, especially on a site titled All Ladies Shaved, on the MetArt Network.

I know you won't change. Neither will I. So here we are.

Lowest score I can give the set, not Tallie mind, Tallie is a 10/10, but this gets a 1/10 for the arousal killing inclusion of men, crew and non-modes in it. If I could, and it would let me, I'd give it a 0/10.

Bummer you've saddled Tallie with this.

Damn. Finally another Tallie set - she's specifically one of the reasons I joined and is always among this list of girls I include when I speak highly of the site and it's lineup of models - and it's a non-model/crew one. Bummer. Sorry they did it to you Tallie, it is what it is, have to stay true to my rating system. If they ever do bring you back again and don't muddle up your shoots with non-models and crew it'll be a ten out ten for sure.

Do you all think the models know that there are members who are frustrated about crew shots, men or women, and that there are members who rate their sets low automatically for their inclusion? If they knew, do you think they'd want you all to stay out of their photographs? It poses an interesting question. Somehow I think if they thought it'd increase their chances of being brought back they'd be fraught with desire to NOT have you all in their photographs, knowing that it earns an automatic 1 from some members. Something to consider.

Fooly - if there were no crew shots would you cancel your membership? And if you do, for all your rhetoric about it being unfair about my abusing the rating system, it being unfair to the girls, I'd say it'd be mighty unfair to the models if you cancelled your membership over the exclusion of non-models from photo sets. Seems kinda twisted logic don't you think?

Just to re-iterate, through January of 2022, anything with crew or non-model photographs in it is an automatic zero from me, non-download and non-view, if it's not tagged and I'm forced to view it anyways to find out it'll result in the same 1 rating, as zeros aren't possible. That's my prerogative as a paying member to rate as I is according to my tastes, likes, wants and desires.

I still think you ought to do a member poll, once and for all - as the clear trend seems to be on my side and not Cooly's.

^ LOL! Too funny. You and your love affair with the dudes on All LADIES Shaved.

If you were still producing B/G content I'd never have signed up in the first place.

Instead of the following: "(I can have no realistic complaint concerning that for BTW)."

It should be "(I can have no realistic complaint concerning that for BTS).

That's fair! And that's how it's done - ALS stepping in and telling me what's up - not a long time member who think they can police the website - you do, not them.

I appreciate what you have to do then, for them. For me, I'll be a one and done, parting ways when my year is up. Fantastic content but for non-model/crew shots. Don't get it nor will I ever and that is THE reason for me not sticking around come next January. (I can have no realistic complaint concerning that for BTW).

Anyhow, there is is though I'll never, ever understand it.

Joined up with MetArtX - second or third update has a dude's hand in the frame pulling down panties.
VivThomas had men movers recently in a scene.

(Regarding those types of shots - have they always been favorites? Haven't they always been complained about? Alex just replied in the blog update the other day the reason for not including the Tanner Mayes photo in the anniversary update was due to reviewers saying members would complain. And didn't you stop B/G content due to member complaints? When I look back in time, on your older sets, sure seems like much more crew shots, dude shots. Newer it gets the less and less there is of it. Is that not the trend? Am I not representative of the overall audience, and those overall shifts over time? So the 1996 thing does little to sway me, personally. Here's to the day you finally ditch them. Be great if you did a Member Poll sometime, if you have or have recently, apologies, I wasn't here for it - you might just be surprised. Or hell, I might be! lol)

Do you, or MetArt Network rather, offer a single solitary man free website?

How do you access the photo sets Fooly? Do you download them, as a zip? If I'm to delete something I need to:

1. Download the ZIP
2. Extract the archive
3. Find the photos with non-models/men/crew in them
4. View them, as I have to view them in order to find them. I don't want to view them.
5. Delete them.
6. Re-Zip the archive again for storage.

Or? Or they could just eliminate non-models/crew/men from the photo sets. Sure sounds a lot easier to me. As well, the very act of having to delete them defeats the purpose as I'm now viewing the content that I simply don't wish to see.

The fantasy isn't the women being surrounded by a bunch of people. I'm not here to be cucked by the crew. The fantasy is they're there posing for me. Looking into my eyes when they look into the camera. Posing off for me. That's what's hot here. Not some odd idea that "Oh, it's so hot knowing they're posing for the camera, look they're surrounded by men and women, gosh that's so hot and arousing." What's hot and arousing to me is the idea of her posing for me, showing off for me, not the idea that this is a well and true photo shoot, that it's all clinical, it's pose pose pose. It's a ruination of immersion when I see those non-model shots, male or female, male being the worst.

Again, I'm not the odd one here - seeking for unfettered, unadulterated, unblemished focus on the women that I'm paying for and that being it.

Whine? Every reply you've ever made to me has been a whiny reply, passive aggressive when not outright so, super defensive over seeing men in the shots. After a couple of them I started defending myself, no longer willing to let you dictate what I ask for, or ask for less of.

I'm not doing a single thing wrong but asking for more photo sets, preferably ALL photo sets to be model only. That's not mean. That's not a bad thing. That's not something worth the time for you to flip out, frothing at the mouth regarding "censorship" . I can and will point out what I like and don't like and there's nothing wrong with that. Keep calling for what you do and don't like - don't tell me what do do and what to call and not call for. I have my tastes. You have yours. Great. You're entitled to yours, even though I'll never understand them. I'm entitled to mine, and I daresay mine are 100% easier to understand in this matter than yours - what's so hard to understand, what's so damn bad, what's so evil about wanting model only photography sets? Why is that such a dastardly thing to suggest? I don't get it.

When I'm watching a motion picture, do I need the production crew in the shot in order to appreciate the work that went into making the film? No, I do not. And for those directors who shoehorn themselves into their movies, ask yourself - what is the motivation for those directors? is it to tell a better story? Is it to make a better movie?

I simply do not want a glimpse of the people who made it happen - I want to see the girls.

You know, the girls that Sargon claims I am being so unfair to. You know, in my quest to see more of them and less of non-models and crew.

Somehow that's gotten twisted into me being unfair to the girls.

Know what's unfair? Shoving yourselves into their photographs and videos. Taking away from THEIR spotlight. Their shine. Their time for themselves. It's like Puff Daddy back in the day shoving himself into all the videos of the artists signed to his label - that was an act that was roundly ridiculed by critics and peers and rightfully so.

Unfair? Unfair is paying to see nude, shaved women and being shown men instead. That's unfair.

Again - I just want to see nude, fully shaved women sans non-models, crew and men. Is that so perverse? How did that sort of simple, innocent desire get so damned maligned? Asking for MORE from the girls is being unfair to them? Asking for their unfettered and unblemished beauty is being unfair to them? It's a twisted sort of perverse logic used to arrive at that conclusion.

The only source of frustration is not with the site, not with the girls, nope - it's with non-models, men and crew being shown. That's the frustration.

If you want recognition do bios on your blog. Do retrospectives of your favorite shoots. Do AMAs for us, where we can interact with you and get to know you. That would be interesting. That would be a place to show appreciation for all the work that goes into it.

Not by inserting yourselves into the photos. I'm not even arguing against BTS films, no way to do a BTS without crew, men, and non-models, I get that. But the photo sets? Yeah, I am making the argument that those should be unfettered and undiluted by any non-model, crew or man.

Again - what is so perverse, wrong, filthy, backwards, reactionary or just fucked up in wanting to see the women that I'm paying for and not the production crew behind the camera? I simply Do Not Understand.

I'd be one of them - thanks for it's removal. Zero interest in seeing stuff like that here. Glad it's kept to a minimum - hope that's what the future holds too.

Less men the better, if there was none - that'd be best.

"...from the Audrey" - lol, that was originally "from the model" but I'd edited afterwords, wanting to use her name and not be so impersonal, then I left in "the" by accident.

Thank you. This is an excellent photography set, fully enjoyable. Nothing here to distract me from the Audrey or pull me out of my enjoyment of her and her sights. The tags? Perfection. This is what I like to see:

- model only
- bare feet
- teen

Nice and simple with a gorgeous fully nude teen babe showing off. For me and my tastes, a 10/10.

And that'll be the sole reason for my non-renewal. It's stunning that I can't seem to find a man free site on the MetArt Network.

Everything else is great. I even get the BTS stuff, particularly for the folks that seem to bizarrely love men in their content. But the photos inclusions of men/crew shots? No thanks.

Enjoy pining for the men, folks, I'll stay pining for a man free experience and rating accordingly, at least until next January, when my membership is up.

Don't worry Fooly Cooly - you'll have your precious playground all to yourself soon enough, with nobody complaining about men in your photos to ruin your day.

PS: Hey, MetArt Network - if you have a guaranteed man free website, let me know.

If there wasn't the presence of non-models then that wouldn't be the case - I don't think it's fair I'm being forced to rate them that way either, if only they didn't have men and/or crew in them that would never be the case. Personally I don't think it's fair to have MEN appear on All LADIES Shaved either. It's a giant disconnect - paying for the women, for the models. When I'm given that without obstruction it inevitably gets a high rating. When I'm not, when they feel the need for some inexplicable reason to put non-model people into the picture, then it's fair game - I want to send as clear a message as possible what I like and what I want more of and what I absolutely do not care for.

I like model only films and sets.

I cannot stand the shoving of nonmdels and men into frame.

If they don't want us to rate them, take the rating system away.

The models don't get rated that way, btw, on their Model page. Only the specific sets and videos that the non-models and crew show up in.

------------------------

Is there ANY adult website that keeps it man free? Any? it simply should NOT be this hard to find a man free pornographic experience.

Least favorite uploads on ALS Scans, the BTS - all the talking from the crew and the sights of them too. O/1.

Truly the most insufferable poster on ALS Scan – get over you "censorship" bit.

I bet you're a conservative, or a Republican aren't you? Probably a Trumper? Maybe a Q member? You sure sound like one with your unhinged rants about censorship.

Greedy too – you've gotten the BTS video for this on the same day, and you'll throw a fit over the suggestion I made? For ONLY the rare days that the BTS is released the same day as the photo set.

You sound so childish with these rants, you go off so hard and for no reason at all. You sound incredibly venomous, bilious in your ranting.

He says "Long Live ALS" as if I'm calling for it'd demise by wanting to be able to enjoy the ALS Women without obstruction. Your zealous rhetoric does your cause a disservice. It's laughable in it's absurd over the top nature.

Do you think every single photo is released in their photo sets? If not every single one then they must be "censoring" them – wonder why they would do such a thing Fooly? Guess they must not even support their own site if they're doing that, going by your poor rhetoric.

I'll comment as I please Cooly – for all your rhetoric about "censorship" what do you think you're trying to do to me? You're not trying to censor me, to bully me, to shout me down? That's the thing with your kind – hypocrites, each and every last one. And that's a well-chosen handle too "Fooly" – as this was a foolish reply from you. I've been nothing but 100% fully respectful in my commenting expect with you, as you refuse to allow that, becoming unhinged any time someone says something you dislike.

You don't run ALS Scan, Fooly. You don't call the shots.

Yeah, I would very much like to see this be a man free site, full stop. I give every single set or video, BTS too, that has a non-model in it a 0/1. Every. Single. One. I signed up for the women, the models. I don't get the obsession with shoving men in these sorts of sites:

on VivThomas they have movers in a scene moving furniture recently
on MetArtX there's a mans hand pulling down panties
on here it happens all the time the inclusion of men and their voices.

I don't get it. It doesn't turn me on. It turns me off and it's a demerit to the value of all those memberships.

I don't have cooties either. I am a member at over 20 different adult websites, the majority of which have B/G scenes. Just the same, for the ones that's supposed to be about the females, or are lesbian, I want not a hint of man in them and that's a bare minimum to ask. Literally. That means:

no men
no men's faces
no men's voices
no men's hands
no men's feet
no men, period.

That's what I would really love for the websites like this, VivThomas, MetArtX, and other's that I'm a member too (two more, I'd drop their names but I'm not shilling for the completion). Women. Not men. That's what turns me on.

Howdy Bob, fancy meeting you here - lol. Guess we're both all over huh? Might not always agree on every little thing but it's funny how we both keep showing up at the same websites, one after the other. You been around here long? I've been here since Jan. Love it, despite, as usual, me and some Gooch niggles, lol. Highly enjoyable content.

Just throwing it out there - if you plan on releasing BTS films with the photo set - know what would be great?

This would be a great opportunity to take care of both your fanbases - the ones who love BTS and crew interactions and views and the ones who simply can't stand seeing them and avoid them at any and all cost including de facto low reviews upon their sight.

You could leave the photo set "model only" and the BTS video, the film, has all the crew and non-model interactions those folks could want.

Just an idea, something that would make this person quite pleased as a development. And an idea ONLY, mind, ONLY, before anyone takes giant umbrage about it, for those instances that you release both the photo set and the BTS for the photo set on the same day.

As to the non-model in this set, it's not egretiou8s and it's not a dude, so there is that! And I love her being barefoot and all - but I have to stick to my principles in regards to that issue, ratings-wise (sorry Michelle!)

Now this one I can settle right in to, thankful for it, I was somewhat apprehensive after yesterdays update and it's inclusion of a certain thing in, based on tagging. Thankfully that's not the case and this one has all my favorite tags! (and none of the ones I dread to see) Let's examine what I love to see:

- petite
- bare feet
- teen
- T2C
- fingering
- masturbation

And it's all Lily, her, her sights, her sounds, the sounds of her pleasure, nothing to obstruct that or pull me out of it. Superb. This one right here? This gets a 10/10 from me.

This needs to be tagged with "non-model" - picture #137, please. I always check the tags first before viewing, as I seek to avoid this and enjoy a male-free experience, had I known I'd never have clicked, I pass those sets and videos right on by.

Checking the tags beforehand we have:

- petite
- bare feet
- bikini
- babe
- lesbian
- teen
- wetting

Wow! And the tags did not disappoint. Great set.

This was an amazing update. Loved it, every single minute, start to finish.

Loved it but for the stockings (you know me - but, it's all good, this one is for the stocking fans, there's more than enough to go around). MInxx is a delight. Always appreciate the dancing vids, and I liked that we got a song's worth of dancing to start and to finish the video.

For me and my tastes? A superlative set, really enjoyed a lot about this one, a personal ten out of ten. Let's take a closer look at this one and some of the things that I enjoyed about it and would love to continue to see even more of.

First off, let's examine the tagging of this set: peeing, finger spreading, small tits, bare feet, tasting, camel toe, teen, self-fisting, stretching, TOE SUCKING (big time, this was super hot), exercise, wetting and distortion. Wow! This one when I checked the tags I was floored as it's just telling me, with tag after tag, I am set up for an excellent set.

-------------------------------------

Some highlights:

#28-30: I like the camel toe bit but also I always like those kind of standing, frank, shots, with their pelvis and lower half forward and towards the camera, their upper torso sort of leaning back just touch.

#36-38: I love seeing her opening up here, and her leg muscles flexing as she's squatting.

#49-52: What can I say? I love seeing a petite teen in short shorts bending over and showing off her tight little ass.

#52-72: I like this series of standing shots, as I'd mentioned before there's just something special about the simple standing shot with the girl being relaxed and looking at us.

#88: Ditto, this time with the shorts being pulled down, this is a great view.

#92-95: Not sure what this pose is called but I have always like versions of it – I call it "Grab the Wall" but when they do that and lift their legs up and onto the wall, showing off themselves in an appealing manner.

#122 & 123: I like all of the rear shots of her riding that bike but these two, and #119 we get to see that amazing, thick, puffy pussy, her full and proud labia majora just mashing against that seat, labia minora nowhere to be seen. I LOVE a fat pussy with trim to no visible labia minora. I also love to see it opened up, played with, see inside, etc. but for just the pussy as is? For me nothing beats that.

#159-194: Really really liked her posing during this, first spreading and then that doggy. The doggy pose was mouth watering. And then this led into the self-fisting, always a sexy thing.

#199: Shoes off and my excitement levels just shot through the roof, that ball of excitement building in the pit of my stomach. This is followed up by some great shots of her smiling at us, standing.

#205 & 206: A favorite pose, shows off the woman so well and her bare feet. Sera has great naturally wrinkly soles. As far as her foot posing goes she does have a tendancy to "scrunch" her toes when trying to point them (as models are so often taught and told to point their toes) and when doing so can cause the big one to came off just a touch oddly crinkled. My super favorite feet posing is simply relaxed, showing it off in it's natural form and shape, or a slight toe spread/waggle. Not a fan of the scrunch overall, or too hard a point. Also walking on tippy toes, showing off their arches during a toe spread or waggle too is super hot.

#208-231: I'm weak! Enjoyed every single photograph of this and will revisit this section many, many times. Self-foot worship and foot play, beside lesbian versions, is my Holy Grail, so thank you very much for this happening to have been included, glad to see that such things aren't verboten and us foot fans get just a touch of the direct stuff thrown our way from time to time. For me this is super arousing, turns me on very much.

#232-234: I like her posing with the two toys, looking excited, just holding them there.

#237-262: Toy Time! Nice use of both, like how she uses them to push each to the opposite side while they're inside her, it presents a really nice visual opening herself up.

#268-274: Close up on her spread and the start of things getting wet. Highly impressive! Seeing the strong flow is always a big time plus.

#281-285: Again that pleased and relaxed full body nude shot, legs spread, it's hard to describe what makes these so dang hot – it's sort of a combination of the lewd frankness of it I think and of course her smiling face and hotness.

And we wrap with her getting a taste. What a performer!

------------------------------

Amazing set, thank you for this one. It's a ten out of ten for me and I gotta say, hope there's still some Sera Ryder left in the tank for future visits. (Or maybe even down the line sometime if the interest is there bringing her back for a round two.)

Delightful!

10/10, great special Anniversary set. I'll be DLing and putting up a fresh wallpaper per week on the desktop.

LOL! You and your bent on "censors". It's not even applicable here. Do you know who has the only control over censorship on this site (market pressure is not censorhsip, btw). Let's examine.

Censor, definition: "an official who examines material that is about to be released, such as books, movies, news, and art, and suppresses any parts that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security." synonyms: expurgator, examiner, inspector, editor
1. (in ancient Rome) either of two magistrates who held censuses and supervised public morals.
Verb - examine (a book, movie, etc.) officially and suppress unacceptable parts of it."

Nobody is hanging over Alex and censoring him. If he does bow to any pressure from the membership base, again, they are not censoring him. There is one person and one person only who could possibly affect censorship on ALS Scan and that is the "official", the "examiner", the "inspector", the "editor" – Alex! Not you (and you do a big time job of trying it, with your harping, carping and otherwise trying to bully anybody that disagrees with you or wants to see something different than you) and not me either.

I do NOT want any B/G on this site. Never did. I came here to get away from men, to enjoy women, and it irks me to no end that I cant' even count on that regularly. That they stopped B/G all those years ago allows me to join, if this was a standard B/G site, I'd never have considered it for joining. Never.

Pretty large assumption that B/G is what cost the Caribbean trips. Sounds to me like someone who simply wants to see more males – I do not. I will never cry any tears over there being less men on ALS Scan.

"So I despise the censors. They make this site worse. And I'm going to happily keep lampooning their absurd pathetic demands as long as they keep trying. If you ever wondered why I do, well there you are."

The biggest thing that makes this site worse is you, your pretentious posting style, your bullying of other folks who want to see stuff different than you. You bent on "censorship" is just that, a bent. It's all consuming. Get over it. It's not what's taking place. And if it was? And the men where being chosen by Alex, the only possible censor in this situation, to be kept out of frame? GOOD! That's reason for me to rejoice. That's reason to say, "Boy, that site makes only content I like, all the time, I should stick around there forever". That's reason for me to be very very happy.

Less men and more women equals a hot and horny time for this fan of the unadulterated FEMININE form.

Just wanted to chime in that I'm seriously impressed with the resolution on those photos - looking forward to that rollout if all goes smooth.

Model Only tag = the model in question being the only thing shown or heard
Non-model tag = seeing or hearing folks other than the model at hand

For me and my tastes, I seek a man-free experience. That means:

- no man hands
- no man face
- no man voice
- no man feet

No man, no males, period, is my strongest preference when viewing solo and/or lesbian content.

That's me. That's my preferences. I can't speak to any others. Nor am I trying to. Only my own likes and desires. It's a big wide world out there and everyone has their own things they love, like, don't like, or want more of. And there's nothing wrong with that or stating them from time to time.

A quick evaluation on recent and upcoming sets, for me and my own personal tastes alone of course:

Over the last six updates, one has been a 10/10:

- Nata (non-model tag)
- Marinate (non-model tag, covered feet)
- Wet Hot American Summer BTS (non-model tag)
- Follow Up Exam (non model tag, covered feet nearly entire time)
- Light Touch – this got a 10/10, bare feet and model only.
- Sexy Suspenders (non-model tag)

Coming up, we have out of the next eight I'm looking forward to two, if they stay model-only (New Toy, Bullseye):

- New Toy (should be good, barefoot, long as it's model-only)
- Doodle Diddle, boots on for who knows how long.
- Sweet Nectar (BTS, I enjoy none of the BTS due to non-model talk and sights)
- 25 year anniversary should be neat (though somehow I know it's going to have a bunch of non-model pictures in it)
- Bullseye (should be good, she's barefoot and it's a masturbation scene, just so long as it stays mode-only)
- Rehydration (covered feet, not looking forward to it)
- Take a Break (covered feet, not looking forward to it)
- Every Which Way (boots on, not looking forward to it)

I just want to put in a plug for some more model-only sets and some more barefoot sets. And yes, this being a finite number of available uploads, one per day, then by proxy of asking for something else, for more of something else, it in turns is asking for less of the inverse, the opposite. No matter the passive aggressiveness, or how one chooses to word the request, the underlying matter remains the same – more of something equals less of something else. So for anyone that I upset with this evaluation by asking for more of what I like, I apologize for that, but there's truly no way to ask for more of something, with a set number of uploads being one per day, without asking for less of something else.

Thanks for your time ALS Scans – I won't be sniping back and forth with any members in this comment section regarding this post, this post is for you, your team, representing me and my views only – I did not post this for anyone else, or for others views, wants or desires. I can only speak to my own.

Thanks for this one! Checked the tags and yup, in addition to being a lovely looking young lady, I'm being told I'm in for a real good time with this one:

- masturbation
- small tits
- petite
- bare feet
- teen
- model only

All the fixings for a classic. Viewing promptly.

Another pass, non-view., non-download:

- four non-model tagged sets in a row

- five of the last seven sets tagged with non-model

Looking forward to a stretch of model-only tagged sets coming soon please.

Shoes on half the time, off half the time, every one wins.

Nothing wrong with members advocating for what they want to see more of. You've got serious issues anytime someone does. It's like your some kind of grousing rooster who will come and peck at anybody who dares voice anything that you disagree with.

In a way, your long time tenure here and ever presence anytime someone calls for something they would like to see more of lends you a bit of a feeling of being a bully.

Leave people alone for asking for more of what they like and what they want to see.

And simply having the girls get barefoot sometime through the scene does not make ALS Scan a foot fetish site.

Though I'd love if we did get some foot fetish, G/G, it's my Holy Grail. Nothing wrong with that. Nothing wrong with me saying that.

And the fact that "Bare Feet" is a tag says as much, contrary to your claims that their inclusion, or advocating for more makes this a foot fetish site. The search function turns up 1,000 results for "Bare Feet". Does that maker it more or less of a "foot fetish" site for you?

Just leave off when people ask for more of what they like.

Big time agree.

There's nothing wrong with rating according to your tastes and preferences. There's nothing wrong with wanting to see more and more of the things you like. I will never get tired of seeing their bare feet. I will never fail to be disappointed when their feet remain covered nearly the entire time or whole time.

That's my prerogative as a paying member. The same as how I choose to rate and for what. I don't like stuff with their feet covered, I don't like stuff with non-models in it and I don't particularly care for super dangly labia minora. Those all get low ratings from me. Stuff what is model only, where they get barefoot and they have puffy labia majora with trim and small labia minora gets high ratings out of me. (And I strongly prefer the video sets, not BTS, model only versus the photo sets though that doesn't affect my ratings on either.)

There's nothing wrong with that. I'm not doing anything wrong with using the rating system to give them feedback. If they don't want us to use it then remove it. Until then I will rate accordingly, for my tastes, not yours or anyone else's.

Shoes on = poor rating from me, full stop. Bare-feet are my thing, covered is a turn off. Big time disappointment. Over the shoes (and the boots recently too).

I dunno but this kind of "non-model" I am more than OK with! lol I was going to avoid the set based on the tag then thought, "Hmm, maybe I'll look" after your comments. In a way - Thanks for the heads up!

My favorite ALS Scan content - Girl Girl action (Masturbation shoots and scenes are the other). Excellent.

Love the braces. I think you'll find it's on account of it being a retro-set and it having the non-model tag and thus folks present in the scene other than the model.

Much prefer this masturbation scene than it's followup and that's on account of the difference between two key tags.

This one had the tag:

- bare feet

Today's upload, 2/21/21 has the tag :

- tall boots

And after checking the tall boots stay on the scene long. This upload, here, "Documented Orgasm"? I rated it a 10.

Tallie is specifically one of the girls that was a reason for my signing up. Big time agree.

Thanks kindly, really pleased to hear!

Well, this looks like a fun time indeed, checking the tags:

- Petite
- Bare Feet
- Masturbation
- (a bonus tag) Pigtails

Well, if it's to help find content then it would be something like, maybe, an "only-model" tag or something to that effect? If I don't see it, I know to just take a casual gander at the front page (as the non-model bits tend to show up a page or two in for photo sets). However, that would probably wind up being a lot of extra-tagging, those ones seemingly being more frequent than the ones that have some crew or assistants showing up.

If it's to help filter out or avoid, perhaps a "non-model" tag; that would be a big bright heads up. And based off just the preview pics on the first page, if it's a photo set, as the non-model bits tend to show up a few pages in, I could even feel confident in throwing it a high rating too – like Michelle's day before yesterday, easily able to tell just how good that would be overall just from the front page of them (regardless of my preferences on just seeing the models, it's clear both this and the prior photo set are very high quality offerings, there's simply no denying that!). That'd be great. Furthermore it'd be less tagging overall for you all to do, as the "non-model" tag needed uploads are far fewer than if an "only-model" tag was opted for.

Either work effectively for me. Or something similar, or something you all come up with that works to the same effect, but just as important, doesn't add a bunch of extra hassle or burden on you all. I really do appreciate this consideration – engendering big time good will and member appreciation with even the consideration.

Eh, I'll just pass. Why I appreciated the tag. Don't want to have to download the ZIP, go through it to locate those ones and then manually delete them and thereby in the process wind up viewing them once again. Why the Tag (Crew or Assistant) is super helpful - lets me move right on by and I don't have the shots pop up as I'm viewing the photos one by one.

That's the thing - without the tag, there's no way to know to avoid; that's the whole thing I'm trying to accomplish. And was allowed that opportunity here, due to the helpful tagging, and not on today's upload, due to the non-tag.

Tons of great content for me to enjoy, don't get it twisted. This site, and the other ones in the Network (I'm over at VivThomas too for a year) have excellent Ease of Use features (My Activity, the blog activity ticker on the side, all of it with link to jump to the relevant sections, the extensive tagging, all the options when downloading) and that's one of the things that very much adds value to the membership. If none of that stuff were around or they didn't show such superlative efforts otherwise in those areas I'd never even mention - but it's a system that's already in place, just seeking to employ it more fully.

I get it - you like it. You love it. You want more of that sort of thing. And anytime anybody says something contrary, or even asks about something that helps them avoid something you like, you've seemingly got to take umbrage with it.

I'm here for the models and not the crew, not the assistants and especially not any that happen to be a male.

As far as males go, I seek as male free an experience as absolutely possible.

The number one thing that's wrong with adult entertainment across the board is too many males, overwhelming amounts of B/G. The last thing I want to do is to see more of it.

I'm not asking them to offer any less of it. Keep it steady, just as much as they have been, keep folks that like it happy, it's a regular thing, I get it. You are a long time and valued member, having been here for many many years. It pays to keep folks like that, reoccurring members happy and well fed!

Just the same, I will do my level best to avoid it every single time, hence why I appreciate the tags, if at all possible. Not asking them to give you any less of what you want. I'm only asking for a tool to help me further filter out the content that I don't want to see. That's not unreasonable. If I were asking them to change it, to stop what they're doing, especially as a new member? Yeah, that's asinine and a pipe dream. Just looking for a tag, that's all. A way to filter it so that I know a given set or video is the model and only the model (as otherwise it's a non-view and a non-download).

Bummer. Checked the tags, all good, proceeding great then what happens? Crew in frame, holding her pussy open. The problem?

No Crew tag.

I had just got done giving y'all props for it's addition and with this release began checking the Tags for "crew" to avoid such sets .

Can the "Crew" tag get added please? I'm here for the girls only, nobody else, so if it's a set with anybody but a model in it, I want to avoid it, preferably. Pretty please, "Crew" tag?

is the "Crew" tag new? I went looking at the tags after viewing the set, to see if there was anything in there to give a heads up of the sort and there was! Thanks kindly. I'll start looking at the tags first before viewing the sets so I know which ones to avoid (I'm here for a Dude Free experience, so the Crew tag is amazingly helpful and welcome and a tool I'll utilize from here on out.)

As to Michelle - her jutting mons pubis is simply mouth watering. Amazing shots of it.